|
of the ribs and pillars for the Ironbridge Why advertise casting defects? This is purely for an academic and historic record. By request we have adopted 18th Century production techniques to produce the castings and by recording observations of the process we are able to offer the theorists proof and reasons for the defects and casting flow patterns that are plainly visible on the original structure at Ironbridge.
|
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|
We then decided we would try and cast the metal faster as the iron had barely reached the 33 feet before it had started to solidify. This brought about other problems the main one being the turbulence of the liquid iron. As the iron hit the ends the backwash was forming waves about 25 mm high, these were running up and down the casting and because the mould was cast open would have spilt over the top if casting continued at the start rate. We slowed to a trickle until the waves had subsided, this however had the effect of cooling grabbing hold of the far end and freezing the action into the casting. Where the waves formed they have been captured by the solidification of the metal at the furthest point away from where we were pouring. |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
| Whereas the rib was of one section we were aware that contraction would
be uniform and in one direction. The pillars on the other hand were irregular,
with a large base at one end and a much thinner section at the other. There
are bends in the original which we were keen to see why. We decided this
was more than likely due to the different cooling rates along the length.
It was reasoned that if we were to throw sand over the open casts as they
cooled it may even out the cooling/contraction and bending. The bending
would occur as each part of the casting from the bottom of the mould up
would cool. Remember that this metal contracts and becomes shorter as it
freezes thus the bottom face shortens and pushes the top upwards. Bearing
this in mind we cast all six of the pillars and covered three of them with
dry sand to allow them to cool more uniformly. The other three were left
to cool naturally. The difference between the two is obvious with the uncovered
castings showing about 30 mm bend.
We also observed as the sand was thrown on the casting it sometimes broke the surface crust which left these areas higher where the force of the sand had crumpled/scabbed the surface by folding the skin that had formed on cooling. Links
|